Eurabian News

Sobre la transformación de Europa en Eurabia y la Tercera Yijad

Israel vs Suecia, la ONU y la Autoridad Nacional Palestina aka Hamas

Posted by Spanish Eowyn en 23/febrero/2006

Sweden’s state-run aid group on Monday pledged more than five million euros in additional aid to the Palestinian territories as Israel and the United States halted much of their funding following Hamas’s election victory.

“The humanitarian situation in the West Bank and Gaza Strip has worsened,” the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) said in a statement, adding that it would provide 50 million kronor (6.4 million dollars) to the United Nations’ aid programs there.

In 2005, SIDA donated nearly 100 million kronor to the Palestinian territories, a spokesman for the group told AFP.

The additional aid was necessary since Israel was not living up to its responsibility as an occupying power, Peter Lundberg of SIDA’s humanitarian unit said in a statement.

“According to the fourth Geneva convention, the occupying power has a particular responsibility to support and ensure the human dignity of the occupied,” he said.

“Since Israel is not living up to its responsibility under international law, large parts of the Palestinian population are now completely dependent on international humanitarian aid,” Lundberg added. (Via Free Thoughts)

Creo que no necesita comentarios…

Pero es la ONU ha criticado a Israel por suspender la ayuda a los palestinos:

UN Middle East Envoy Alveran de Soto blasted Israel’s decision not to transfer funds to the Palestinian Authority following the induction of the new Hamas-led Parliament.

In his statement on Monday, De Soto called the steps “futile” and “haphazard” adding, “The funds belong to the Palestinians and it is illegal to block them.”

No me diga más: los israelíes tienen que pagar a una entidad que directamente ha dicho que NO piensa renunciar a eliminar Israel (de hecho ahora en una web amenaza con ¡¡¡tirar bombas nucleares a Israel!!!). Muy bien, tiene lógica. Siempre que entendamos la lógica como no-lógica, claro.

UPDATE/ACTUALIZACIÓN: Encuentro en el blog Big Picture lo siguiente al respecto:

Israel has been collecting monthly tax and customs receipts and giving these funds to the Palestinians, on condition that the Palestinians abide by specific agreements — agreements which they have now abrogated:
The transfer of the money, which has been routine, is part of the accords signed between Israel and the PA [Palestinian Authority], part of the Oslo Agreement and the Paris Protocol,” said [Israeli spokesman] Mark Regev. “Now Hamas, the new incoming leadership on the Palestinian side, say they reject all those agreements – from their point of view those agreements are null and void. So they cannot have it both ways. They cannot say they are against all these agreements and then, at the same time, expect Israel to keep the part of the agreement they want, which is the transfer of funds.”

Ahora Hamas […] dice que rechaza los acuerdos [de Oslo por los que Israel daba a la Autoridad Palestina el 75% de lo recaudado del impuesto de la renta de los palestinos residentes en Israel empleados en Israel y el 100% de lorecaudado del impuesto de la renta de los palestinos residentes en Israel empleados en los asentamientos ] -desde su punto de vista los acuerdos sob nulos e inválidos. Así que no pueden tener las dos cosas”. Pero, claro, los medios de esto, nada de nada (NYT, BBC). Lo recoge también Solomonia.

Pero claro, siempre hay alguien que piensa esto:

[…] the main objective of my writing today, is to nail the lie that to reject Zionism as it practised today is in effect to be anti-semitic, to be an inheritor of Hitler’s racism. That argument, with the Holocaust in the background, is nothing other than moral blackmail. It is highly effective. It condemns many to silence who fear to be thought anti-semitic. They are often the very opposite. They are often people whose heart bleeds at Israel’s betrayal of its true heritage.

I began with the recognition that the cancer of anti-semitism has not been cured. Tragically, Israel’s policies feed it – and when world Jewry defends Israeli policies right or wrong, then anger turns not only against Israel, but against all Jews. I wish it were mere rhetoric to say that Israeli politics today make a holocaust the day after tomorrow credible. If the whole Muslim world hates Israel, that is no idle speculation. To count on Arab disunity and Muslim sectarian conflict and a permanent American shield is no recipe for long-term security. (via Free Thoughts)

¿The Guardian? Sí, es un periódico inglés muy parcial con los musulmanes que incluso ha llegado a abogar por la sharia pero cambiándola por “ley familiar musulmana” para hacerla más aceptable al público británico:

In November 2004 an editorial in the Guardian (where else?) made the helpful suggestion that sharia could be spun as “Muslim family law” to make it more acceptable to the wider British public. “Muslim family law” – I can already hear the phrase tripping off the tongues of Labour ministers. (via Drinking from Home).

Así que le han puesto al The Guardian el siguiente logo:

Lo que dije el otro día: Los pedos huelen a rosas. (Lo siento, este blog NO es políticamente correcto).

2 comentarios para “Israel vs Suecia, la ONU y la Autoridad Nacional Palestina aka Hamas”

  1. […] Más información sobre Hamas y la ayuda palestina: ISrael contra la Suecia, la ONU y la ANP, La financiación de Hamas Hamas y el expresidente Carter, Hamas y sus amigos bananeros y Eurabia seguirá financiando al llamado pueblo palestino. […]

  2. About peacemakers and Middle East terrorism

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
A %d blogueros les gusta esto: