The spirit which governed the creation of Mecca-Cola was to create a profit-making business which would help to relieve human suffering where action is still possible. The most intolerable and the most immediate suffering is that of the Palestinian people. The Palestinian people are experiencing indifference and general complicity, these being the most wretched and the most contemptible acts of apartheid and Zionist fascism.
Archive for 22/01/06
Barbie con velo.
Posted by Spanish Eowyn en 22/enero/2006
Posted in Mujer, Multiculturalismo, Noticias sorprendentes, Reflexiones | 1 Comment »
Irán planea un test nuclear y califica de “vergonzosas” las declaraciones de Chirac
Posted by Spanish Eowyn en 22/enero/2006
Las últimas noticias desde Irán son muy preocupantes:
Debka: Iran Plans Nuke Test
…and moves Shahab missiles within range of Israel: Western and Israeli intelligence have known for more than six months that Iran’s nuclear program has reached the capability of being able to carry out a nuclear explosion, albeit underground. It would probably be staged in a desert or mountain region and activated by a distant control center. Tehran would aim at confronting the Americans, Europeans and Israelis with an irreversible situation….[A]n Iranian underground nuclear blast, which will most probably be attempted on March 22, would turn around the strategic position of all the parties concerned and the Middle East as whole.
Telegraph: Major Construction at Iran Nuke PlantWestern intelligence agencies are focusing on alarming similarities in satellite imagery of Iran’s nuclear sites, which the regime claims are for civilian purposes, and atomic facilities in Pakistan used to make the raw materials for nuclear weapons, as they try to identify the purpose of the Natanz construction spree.The building work took place unannounced during a 16-month pause in research and development at the site, while Iran engaged the West in protracted talks over its professed desire to develop nuclear power….
Evidence of new building at Natanz has further fuelled concerns about Iran’s intentions. “It is surprising to see how much construction work has taken place,” said Mr Pike. “The Iranians have been very busy even while the seals were in place.”
Hadad-Adel said the French president was merely “trying to restore the prestige of France after the recent unrest, when young people took to the streets and torched hundreds of cars every night.”“The French need to make an effort to remove the shame of the the massacre of mlns of Algerians, France’s support for Saddam Hussein and the massacres in Africa and Rwanda,” Hadad-Adel said in a speech to deputies carried by state radio.
[…] argued that Chirac’s warning was a sign of the double standards Iran has long complained about.It said Chirac had defied the NPT and calls for nuclear disarmament, and said France “has no right to be a member of world’s nuclear club or comment on other countries“.
“His remarks mean the French government would use the atomic bomb to oppress the ones who seek liberty,” the paper said in a comment that could be seen as alluding to Iran’s support for Palestinian militants.
“Everybody knows they label anyone who opposes their exploitative and colonial demands as terrorists, and that any country sheltering such people and supports them is named a supporter of terorists,” the paper wrote.
“(Chirac) has unveiled the true face of the West,” it said, asking why Iran should “still wait for negotiations” over its own nuclear programme.
Posted in Crisis nuclear, Francia, Irán, ONU | 2 Comments »
Una marca danesa, propiedad norteamericana vende camisetas a 5 euros a favor de las FARC y del FPLP
Posted by Spanish Eowyn en 22/enero/2006
Fighters+Lovers is a private enterprise dedicated to the cause of freedom and hard-rocking streetwear. Communication is key to any change. 5 euros of the price you pay for our products at an authorized dealer’s are sent straight to Palestine or Colombia, where your money is paying for new equipment for radio stations and graphics workshops run by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) or the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). This is our tribute to these freedom fighters.Fighters+Lovers is a registered Scandinavian brand owned by VS.PFLP (Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine)
Israel’s occupation of Palestinian land has forced millions of Palestinians to live as refugees, often under miserable conditions. The United Nations has recognized the Palestinians right to armed resistance against the illegal Israeli occupation.PFLP doesn’t just fight the Israeli Army, the organization also runs a network of refugee camps, schools and health clinics throughout the Middle East.FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia)
Left with no other choice, young people, unionists, teachers and even priests have taken up arms to join the biggest guerrilla army Latin America has ever seen: the FARC.Increasing it’s power and number of troops day by day, FARC has liberated large chunks of Colombia from the terror of the regime’s death squads. Closely allied to Indigenous people and the Black minority, FARC’s tens of thousands of guerrilla fighters have wooed to bring down the corrupt rule of the drug lords led by President Alvaro Uribe.
Both FARC and PFLP are listed by the US State Department as Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations.


Posted in Dinamarca, Israel-Palestina, Multiculturalismo, Negocios, Noticias sorprendentes, Terrorismo | Comentarios desactivados en Una marca danesa, propiedad norteamericana vende camisetas a 5 euros a favor de las FARC y del FPLP
El antisemitismo en el cine y en el teatro
Posted by Spanish Eowyn en 22/enero/2006
Me he enterado estos días de diversas noticias que son cuando menos impactantes. La primera es sobre una obra que se está representando en Madrid. Nos lo cuenta Desde Sefarad :
Libelos como Conversación con Primo Levi no solo demuestran que la educación y pedagogía en lo que realmente supuso el Holocausto es nula sino también constituyen la prueba más fehaciente de la buena salud de la que disfruta el fenómeno judeófobo en este país. Y es que bajo el disfraz de lo políticamente correcto, ¿personas? como Mercedes Lezcano manifiestan hasta qué punto el odio al estado de Israel y a los judíos puede suponer la más baja degradación humana. (leedlo entero).

Dr. Benjamin Berger’s son David, an American-born Jewish weightlifter on the Israeli Olympic team in 1972, was one of 11 Israeli athletes taken hostage and subsequently murdered by the PLO at the Munich Games. Today, Dr. Berger slams Steven Spielberg’s portrayal, in the movie Munich, of one of the most notorious terror attacks in Israel’s history.
Además, la película incurre en algunos errores importantes, como que Yuval Amiv, el hombre en cuyo testimonio se basa la película, nunca trabajó para el Mossad o cualquier otra oficina de Inteligencia judía:
Yossi Melman, a specialist in intelligence affairs with Ha’aretz and Steven Hartov, editor-in-chief of Special Operations Report, have discovered that Yuval Aviv, whom director Steven Spielberg relied upon for the film ‘Munich’, never served in the Mossad or any Israeli intelligence organization . His nearest approximation to spy work was as a gate guard for El Al in New York in the early 1970s.
Y añade: lo más cerca que estuvo del trabajo de espía fue ser guarda de seguridad para El Al en Nueva York al principio de los 70. O sea otra película como la de “Mission Imposible 2”. Y con esta película quería restaurar su prestigio perdido.
Ahora bien, lo mejor de la historia es que el cerebro del atentado también ha criticado a Spielberg (via CUANAS) diciendo que ¡¡¡debería haber escuchado a ambas partes en lugar de servir a la causa sionista!!!
Mohammed Daoud planned the Munich attack on behalf of PLO splinter group Black September, but did not take part and does not feature in the film. He voiced outrage at not being consulted for the thriller and accused Spielberg of pandering to the Jewish state.
“If he really wanted to make it a prayer for peace he should have listened to both sides of the story and reflected reality, rather than serving the Zionist side alone,” Daoud told Reuters by telephone from the Syrian capital, Damascus.
Daoud said he had not seen the film, which will only reach most screens outside the United States next month. But he noted that Spielberg arranged previews in Israel, where some have accused “Munich” of lacking historical accuracy.
“Spielberg showed the movie to widows of the Israeli victims, but he neglected the families of Palestinian victims,” said Daoud. “How many Palestinian civilians were killed before and after Munich?” …
“We did not target Israeli civilians,” he said. “Some of them (the athletes) had taken part in wars and killed many Palestinians. Whether a pianist or an athlete, any Israeli is a soldier.” …
“No pusimos como objetivos a civiles israelíes. Algunos de ellos (los atletas) habían tomado parte en guerras y matado a muchos palestinos. Aunque sea un pianista o un atleta, cualquier israelí es un soldado”.
Es alucinante la lógica de este hombre. Primero, “nuestros objetivos NO eran civiles”. Luego, “ALGUNOS habían tomado parte en guerras y matado a muchos palestinos”. Y por último, “CUALQUIER israelí es un soldado”. Ergo, si cualquier israelí es un soldado, NO es un civil y por tanto, a) merece ser asesinado y b) da igual que haya o no matado palestinos, debe morir porque es un soldado. Es patéticamente semejante al testimonio de Umm Nidal , la madre de los tres terroristas palestinos que se suicidaron y respecto de los que dijo:
Y por fin, le pregunta si son igual de legítimas las acciones contra civiles que contra soldados, a lo que responde:
Umm Nidal: “No hay ninguna diferencia. Esto es la ley religiosa islámica. No invento nada. Sigo la ley religiosa islámica en esto. Un musulmán es muy cuidadosa para no matar a una persona inocente, porque sabe que si no irá al Infierno etreno. Así que no es tan simple. Nosotros nos basamos en la ley religiosa islámica cuando decimos que se puede matar a esta gente”.
Y ya para terminar tenemos a la película sobre los terroristas palestinos, de la que tenemos aquí un post redactado por Cruzcampo.
Del mundillo en cuestión nos viene ahora la última cagada de esta punta de cobardes, el premio con el Globazo de Oro a una película extranjera , Paradise Now, que exalta las bondades de unos pobres terroristas que tienen la penosa tarea de matar a unos cuantos judíos en Tel Aviv, y que dan mucha penita, jolin, tienen que comer por última vez , grabar esos coñazos de videos para decir, ‘me voy fulana cuida de mengano, esto es por Allah, bla bla bla…’, y toda una serie de actividades lacrimógenas que no dan lugar a la duda. Sniff sniff…
Para DavidsMedienkritik es la primera película abiertamente antisemita que se ha visto ene l cine alemán, con frases como “Los israelíes son los ocupantes criminales que oprimen a los paletinos. Y deben ser combatidos mediante el asesinato y la fuerza” o “los israelíes sólo deben ser combatidos con pacíficas manifestaciones anti-violencia”, pero dejando ambas posibilidades abiertas para el interesado. Además, la película, que no expresa ninguna crítica moral a la práctica de los ataques suicidas que matan a civiles israelíes (¿será porque todos son soldados?), ha sido financiada por el contribuyente alemán. Para colmo de males uno de los terroristas deja de suicidarse porque había un niño en el autobús, mientras que otro se suicida en un autobús lleno de soldados israelíes. Como si a los terroristas palestinos eso les impidiera alguna vez suicidarse…
Paradise Now” is the first openly anti-Semitic film I’ve seen in the German cinema. Joseph Goebbels would have been proud of the numerous Germans who collaborated in its production (the film is distributed by Constantin Film/Munich). He would have praised in glowing terms the fact that the German taxpayer ponied up an essential contribution to the production costs. The materials for discussion of the film in German schools authored by a federal authority from the Central Office for Political Education (BPB) would have met with his grinning approval. […]
The film expresses no moral criticism of the Palestinian suicide attackers’ practice of murdering Israeli civilians. The only thing under dispute is whether suicide attacks actually weaken the “occupiers”. In one of the film’s most ridiculously revisionist scenes, the main character shrinks from the bomb attack
at the last moment, because there’s a little kid on the bus – as though the history of Palestinian suicide attacks weren’t synonymous with a history of murdering countless innocent women, children and other civilians. At the film’s conclusion, the screenplay replaces the suicide attack with one on a bus full of Israeli soldiers. The suicide enjoys the mitigating aura of a quasi-military action.
Posted in Cine, Medios de comunicación, Reflexiones, Terrorismo | Comentarios desactivados en El antisemitismo en el cine y en el teatro