Comentarios en: Argelia promulga una ley para frenar el avance del cristianismo http://noticiasdeeurabia.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/argelia-promulga-una-ley-para-frenar-el-avance-del-cristianismo/ Sobre la transformación de Europa en Eurabia y la Tercera Yijad Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:57:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Por: isabelhavuelto http://noticiasdeeurabia.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/argelia-promulga-una-ley-para-frenar-el-avance-del-cristianismo/#comment-1310 Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:47:15 +0000 http://noticiasdeeurabia.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/argelia-promulga-una-ley-para-frenar-el-avance-del-cristianismo/#comment-1310 Hubo una época en que la Iglesia también juzgaba y condenaba por las ideas. Pero cambió, porque la sociedad le hizo cambiar, y hoy no se concibe que alguien milite en una religión por imposición violenta y no por elección personal y libre, siguiendo los dictados de la conciencia. Las creencias impuestas no son creencias. Pero, por la misma razón, Si creemos en la libertad de conciencia tenemos la obligación moral de hacer que los que se empeñan en presentar la cara más radical de las religiones cambien de actitud. Si creemos en el respeto debemos ser firmes a la hora de exigirlo. Por sus creyentes y por los que no lo son. No abandonemos a su suerte a las víctimas de leyes brutales, simplemente porque tenemos miedo.

]]> Por: Ajopringue http://noticiasdeeurabia.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/argelia-promulga-una-ley-para-frenar-el-avance-del-cristianismo/#comment-1255 Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:34:32 +0000 http://noticiasdeeurabia.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/argelia-promulga-una-ley-para-frenar-el-avance-del-cristianismo/#comment-1255 La religión de la paz con la libertad

Los guerreros santos de la religión de la paz™ siguen mostrando su tolerancia con el apóstata afgano:[…]“Rejecting Islam is insulting God. We will not allow God to be humiliated. This man must die,” said cleric Abdul Raoulf…

]]> Por: enzo http://noticiasdeeurabia.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/argelia-promulga-una-ley-para-frenar-el-avance-del-cristianismo/#comment-1247 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:23:42 +0000 http://noticiasdeeurabia.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/argelia-promulga-una-ley-para-frenar-el-avance-del-cristianismo/#comment-1247 Excellente post. Esto es un ejemplo de Islamismo moderato del cual habla mucha gente sin saber que no existe.
I wrote a post today on the same subject.
Ciao

]]> Por: Dr Gorroño http://noticiasdeeurabia.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/argelia-promulga-una-ley-para-frenar-el-avance-del-cristianismo/#comment-1241 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 12:16:34 +0000 http://noticiasdeeurabia.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/argelia-promulga-una-ley-para-frenar-el-avance-del-cristianismo/#comment-1241 Es para defecarse en sus muertos. Pero bueno, siempre pueden decir que es laicismo…

He enviado al buzón un artículo sobre los US que os va a interesar.

]]> Por: The Anti-Jihad Pundit » Blog Archive » Enclaves to practise Islam in the West http://noticiasdeeurabia.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/argelia-promulga-una-ley-para-frenar-el-avance-del-cristianismo/#comment-1239 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 12:15:29 +0000 http://noticiasdeeurabia.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/argelia-promulga-una-ley-para-frenar-el-avance-del-cristianismo/#comment-1239 [...] Enclaves to practise Islam in the West And this happens, when an Afghan is surely condemned to death beacuse of his conversion to Christianity and in Argelia a new law has been issued to condemn to prison and to fine the people who intend to convert a Muslim (that is, anyone that speaks about other religions -mainly Christianism-) and is obliging them to only practise their religion in appointed places. Well, as I said before: reciprocity is a NEED to protect this kind of people in countries where there is no freedom of religion, no matter who says the contrary. The Islamist Challenge to the U.S. Constitution – Middle East Quarterly – Spring 2006 First in Europe and now in the United States, Muslim groups have petitioned to establish enclaves in which they can uphold and enforce greater compliance to Islamic law. While the U.S. Constitution enshrines the right to religious freedom and the prohibition against a state religion, when it comes to the rights of religious enclaves to impose communal rules, the dividing line is more nebulous. Can U.S. enclaves, homeowner associations, and other groups enforce Islamic law? Such questions are no longer theoretical. While Muslim organizations first established enclaves in Europe,[1] the trend is now crossing the Atlantic. Some Islamist community leaders in the United States are challenging the principles of assimilation and equality once central to the civil rights movement, seeking instead to live according to a separate but equal philosophy. The Gwynnoaks Muslim Residential Development group, for example, has established an informal enclave in Baltimore because, according to John Yahya Cason, director of the Islamic Education and Community Development Initiative, a Baltimore-based Muslim advocacy group, “there was no community in the U.S. that showed the totality of the essential components of Muslim social, economic, and political structure.”[2]Baltimore is not alone. In August 2004, a local planning commission in Little Rock, Arkansas, granted The Islamic Center for Human Excellence authorization to build an internal Islamic enclave to include a mosque, a school, and twenty-two homes.[3] While the imam, Aquil Hamidullah, says his goal is to create “a clean community, free of alcohol, drugs, and free of gangs,”[4] the implications for U.S. jurisprudence of this and other internal enclaves are greater: while the Little Rock enclave might prevent the sale of alcohol, can it punish possession and in what manner? Can it force all women, be they residents or visitors, to don Islamic hijab (headscarf)? Such enclaves raise the fundamental questions of when, how, and to what extent religious practice may supersede the U.S. Constitution.The internal Muslim enclave proposed by the Islamic Center for Human Excellence in Arkansas represents a new direction for Islam in the United States. The group seeks to transform a loosely organized Muslim population into a tangible community presence. The group has foreign financial support: it falls under the umbrella of a much larger Islamic group, “Islam 4 the World,” an organization sponsored by Sharjah, one of the constituent emirates of the United Arab Emirates.[5] While the Islamic Center for Human Excellence has yet to articulate detailed plans for its Little Rock enclave, the group’s reliance on foreign funding is troublesome. Past investments by the United Arab Emirates’ rulers and institutions have promoted radical interpretations of Islam. [6]The Islamic Center for Human Excellence may seek to segregate schools and offices by gender. The enclave might also exercise broad control upon commerce within its boundaries—provided the economic restrictions did not discriminate against out-of-state interests or create an undue burden upon interstate commerce. But most critically, the enclave could promulgate every internal law—from enforcing strict religious dress codes to banning alcohol possession and music; it could even enforce limits upon religious and political tolerance. Although such concepts are antithetical to a free society, U.S. democracy allows the internal enclave to function beyond the established boundaries of our constitutional framework. At the very least, the permissible parameters of an Islamist enclave are ill defined. [...]

]]> Por: The Anti-Jihad Pundit » Blog Archive » Enclaves to practise Islam in the West http://noticiasdeeurabia.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/argelia-promulga-una-ley-para-frenar-el-avance-del-cristianismo/#comment-1240 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 12:15:29 +0000 http://noticiasdeeurabia.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/argelia-promulga-una-ley-para-frenar-el-avance-del-cristianismo/#comment-1240 [...] Enclaves to practise Islam in the West And this happens, when an Afghan is surely condemned to death beacuse of his conversion to Christianity and in Argelia a new law has been issued to condemn to prison and to fine the people who intend to convert a Muslim (that is, anyone that speaks about other religions -mainly Christianism-) and is obliging them to only practise their religion in appointed places. Well, as I said before: reciprocity is a NEED to protect this kind of people in countries where there is no freedom of religion, no matter who says the contrary. The Islamist Challenge to the U.S. Constitution – Middle East Quarterly – Spring 2006 First in Europe and now in the United States, Muslim groups have petitioned to establish enclaves in which they can uphold and enforce greater compliance to Islamic law. While the U.S. Constitution enshrines the right to religious freedom and the prohibition against a state religion, when it comes to the rights of religious enclaves to impose communal rules, the dividing line is more nebulous. Can U.S. enclaves, homeowner associations, and other groups enforce Islamic law? Such questions are no longer theoretical. While Muslim organizations first established enclaves in Europe,[1] the trend is now crossing the Atlantic. Some Islamist community leaders in the United States are challenging the principles of assimilation and equality once central to the civil rights movement, seeking instead to live according to a separate but equal philosophy. The Gwynnoaks Muslim Residential Development group, for example, has established an informal enclave in Baltimore because, according to John Yahya Cason, director of the Islamic Education and Community Development Initiative, a Baltimore-based Muslim advocacy group, “there was no community in the U.S. that showed the totality of the essential components of Muslim social, economic, and political structure.”[2]Baltimore is not alone. In August 2004, a local planning commission in Little Rock, Arkansas, granted The Islamic Center for Human Excellence authorization to build an internal Islamic enclave to include a mosque, a school, and twenty-two homes.[3] While the imam, Aquil Hamidullah, says his goal is to create “a clean community, free of alcohol, drugs, and free of gangs,”[4] the implications for U.S. jurisprudence of this and other internal enclaves are greater: while the Little Rock enclave might prevent the sale of alcohol, can it punish possession and in what manner? Can it force all women, be they residents or visitors, to don Islamic hijab (headscarf)? Such enclaves raise the fundamental questions of when, how, and to what extent religious practice may supersede the U.S. Constitution.The internal Muslim enclave proposed by the Islamic Center for Human Excellence in Arkansas represents a new direction for Islam in the United States. The group seeks to transform a loosely organized Muslim population into a tangible community presence. The group has foreign financial support: it falls under the umbrella of a much larger Islamic group, “Islam 4 the World,” an organization sponsored by Sharjah, one of the constituent emirates of the United Arab Emirates.[5] While the Islamic Center for Human Excellence has yet to articulate detailed plans for its Little Rock enclave, the group’s reliance on foreign funding is troublesome. Past investments by the United Arab Emirates’ rulers and institutions have promoted radical interpretations of Islam. [6]The Islamic Center for Human Excellence may seek to segregate schools and offices by gender. The enclave might also exercise broad control upon commerce within its boundaries—provided the economic restrictions did not discriminate against out-of-state interests or create an undue burden upon interstate commerce. But most critically, the enclave could promulgate every internal law—from enforcing strict religious dress codes to banning alcohol possession and music; it could even enforce limits upon religious and political tolerance. Although such concepts are antithetical to a free society, U.S. democracy allows the internal enclave to function beyond the established boundaries of our constitutional framework. At the very least, the permissible parameters of an Islamist enclave are ill defined. [...]

]]>